Pequiven's Standardized Model for Measuring the Projects Definition Rating Index (PDRI)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58720/bis.v3i1.73Keywords:
Standardized model, PDRI, Project Scope, PequivenAbstract
The objective of this work is to propose a standardized model for the evaluation of the degree of scope definition in Pequiven projects, based mainly on the theories of the GGPIC (2010), Cartay (2010), Construction Industry Institute (2009; 2012) and Project Management Institute (2017). The design that was taken was the non-experimental, descriptive transectional field. Likewise, the population that was considered was based on a non-probabilistic census, made up of 17 specialists as an evaluation group in charge of applying the PDRI tool in the projects to be executed in Pequiven. Regarding the data collection instrument, the survey was used as a technique through a questionnaire-type instrument, which was composed of 70 items, distributed within 10 elements concerning certain technical aspects of Engineering and business. Finally, the achievement of inferring and normalizing the questions (questions) to be used as analysis criteria is concluded. These will allow the strengthening of the measurement and will guide the ponderables to be considered for an adequate definition package.
Downloads
References
Bingham, E. (2010). Development of the Project Definition Rating Index (PDRI) for Infrastructure Projects. [tesis de maestría, Universidad Estatal de Arizona, Arizona, Estados Unidos]. Repositorio Institucional ASU. https://bit.ly/3I7kGzK
Cartay, I. (2010). Gestión de proyectos un enfoque PDVSA. Mérida, Venezuela: Editorial Torococo. https://bit.ly/3nrhBCH
Construction Industry Institute (2009). Project Definition Rating Index. Industrial Projects. Implementation Resource 113-2 (versión 3.2). Texas, Estados Unidos: Autoedición.
Construction Industry Institute (2012). Project Definition Rating Index (PDRI) for Infrastructure Projects. Participant Handbook. Texas, Estados Unidos: Autoedición. https://bit.ly/33DErQb
De Canales, F., De Alvarado, E. y Pineda, E. (1994) [1986]. Metodología de la investigación. Organización Panamericana de la Salud (2.a ed.). Wáshington, D. C., Estados Unidos: Organización Panamericana de la Salud. https://bit.ly/3qrT9mj
GGPIC (2010). Guías de gerencia para proyectos de inversión de capital. Petróleos de Venezuela. Caracas, Venezuela: Autoedición.
Hernández, R. Fernández, C & Baptista, P (2006). Metodología de la investigación (4.a ed.). Ciudad de México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana. https://bit.ly/3zZAhyg
Hurtado, J. (2010). Metodología de la investigación: guía para una comprensión holística de la ciencia (4.a ed.). Caracas, Venezuela: Quirón Ediciones. https://bit.ly/3I7uCcw
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (2013). Diseño de cuestionarios. México: Autoedición. https://bit.ly/3rh61ep
Palella, S. & Martins, F. (2010) [2003]. Metodología de la investigación cuantitativa (2.a ed.). Caracas, Venezuela: Fondo Editorial de la Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador. https://bit.ly/3qtqZHD
Peñalver, G. (2010). Artefactos para gestionar el alcance de los proyectos informáticos. En I Congreso Iberoamericano de Ingeniería de Proyectos (pp. 321-332). La Habana, Cuba: Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas. https://bit.ly/3nuyPz3
Project Management Institute (2017). Guía de los fundamentos para la dirección de proyectos (guía del PMBOK®) (6.a ed.). Pensilvania, Estados Unidos: Autoedición. https://bit.ly/3nsZITL
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors exclusively transfer the right to publish their article to our journal, which may formally edit or modify the approved text to comply with its own editorial norms and universal grammatical standards, before publication; Likewise, our journal may translate approved manuscripts into as many languages as it deems necessary and disseminate them in several countries, always giving public recognition to the author or authors of the research.
